<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">English Channel Gillnet Pollack Survey 2011/12 - Fisheries Science Partnership</dc:title>
  <dc:type xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dataset</dc:type>
  <dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">https://portal.medin.org.uk/portal/start.php?tpc=009_CEFASf8d952bd-c11f-4d20-b156-a40b6b830e43</dc:identifier>
  <dc:description xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">This work was carried out as part of the Fisheries Science Partnership (FSP), 
a Defra-funded collaborative programme of scientific research between the UK 
fishing industry and scientists.

Fishermen that normally switch from netting in the western channel to netting 
in the southern north sea in early spring, wanted to explore the viability of 
wreck netting for pollack within the channel. The fishermen theorised using a 
large mesh net in the channel, would be a feasible alternative to fishing the 
North Sea, were the minimising of the bycatch of cod is a problem.

From late February through to mid March 2012, 100 hauls were observed by Cefas 
scientists. Catch varied from one wreck to the next. But overall the Jubilee 
Pride successfully demonstrated the feasibility of conducting a targeted 
fishery for pollack. Catches were dominated by pollack and bib. Pollack 
accounted for nearly 90% of the total landed weight of fish. Bib on the other 
hand was mostly discarded, accounting for just 0.7% of the total landed weight 
of fish. After pollack, the next biggest landing was ling accounting for 6% of 
the total landed weight of fish. The contribution of cod to the total landed 
weight of fish was just over 1% (just 20 individuals taken throughout the 
survey).

The bycatch of sensitive species such as marine mammals and sharks was 
minimal, with no mammals caught and just a few tope and spurdog.</dc:description>
  <dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">20161114 20151214</dc:date>
</oai_dc:dc>
