<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2009, COWRIE, Revised Best Practice Guidance for the Use of Remote Techniques for Ornithological Monitoring at Offshore Windfarms</dc:title>
  <dc:type xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">series</dc:type>
  <dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">https://portal.medin.org.uk/portal/start.php?tpc=015_977ecc865211479b986301d84a64eb2c</dc:identifier>
  <dc:description xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">This COWRIE report updates the Desholm et al. (2005) document on the use of remote techniques for 
ornithlogical monitoring for offshore windfarm studies.
However, Desholm et al. (2005) did not provide offshore windfarm developers with clear and
practical guidance on the &#x2018;best practice&#x2019; application of remote techniques for effectively
observing the behaviour of target bird species. In the UK, &#x2018;best practice&#x2019; guidance to highlight
appropriate remote techniques for assessing behaviour of individual target species, or groups of
species, has been much needed. Consequently, the implementation of remote techniques in
ornithological assessments within Environmental Impact Assessments (EIA) was variable during
Round 1 (R1) and Round 2 (R2) in the UK.The aim of this report was not to re-iterate technical information contained within the original
COWRIE report but to provide clear &#x2018;best practice&#x2019; guidance. Our aim is to ensure that this
guidance is applicable for ornithological assessments made within the planning and EIA process
for the STWR and R3in the UK.</dc:description>
  <dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">20090601 20090601</dc:date>
</oai_dc:dc>
