<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2011, Cefas, Seabed restoration following marine aggregate dredging: Do the benefits justify the costs?</dc:title>
  <dc:type xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">series</dc:type>
  <dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">https://portal.medin.org.uk/portal/start.php?tpc=015_c90d2477363652528163f320d1a3b9ee</dc:identifier>
  <dc:description xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">This project is a study of an area where impacts of dredging are known to persist 8 years after cessation of dredging activity. The study covered both topographic and sediment composition. The study was carried out to determine effective restoration techniques at the case study site, in order to make recommendations for other sites following cost benefit analysis.</dc:description>
  <dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">20110228 20110228</dc:date>
</oai_dc:dc>