<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:title xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">2005, Environmentally Sustainable Systems Ltd., Kentish Flats Offshore Wind Farm, Monitoring Report</dc:title>
  <dc:type xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">series</dc:type>
  <dc:identifier xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">https://portal.medin.org.uk/portal/start.php?tpc=015_d5c51bcc-a1cf-4e44-a458-6e94fa2cacb0</dc:identifier>
  <dc:description xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">This Third Monitoring report analyses the results of the 17 boat surveys from December 2004 to
November 2005 for the Kentish Flats Wind Farm, and includes aerial data collected over six surveys
during the same period in the area surrounding the wind farm. The purpose of this report is to meet the
FEPA license monitoring requirements determined by DEFRA (following advice from English Nature)
as a planning consent condition for the construction of the Kentish Flats project. Population estimates
with means and standard errors for the wind farm site and buffer zone and for the control site have been
calculated using the data collected during each of the 70 boat surveys since October 2001. Standard
errors have been updated and improved by the larger (4-year) dataset. Relative abundance indices have
been calculated with standard errors for all WWT aerial surveys covering Kentish Flats. Tests have
revealed no statistically significant changes between the preconstruction and construction periods.

The statistical comparisons of the boat and aerial survey data from the pre-construction and
construction periods do not reveal any statistically significant changes in the abundances of bird
populations (FEPA Objective 1). The boat analyses are somewhat restricted by the lack of comparable
data from the control area, especially during the peak diver period, and the lack of consistency in the
dates on which surveys were completed, together with the natural and in some cases extensive seasonal
and inter-annual variation in the numbers and distributions of bird populations. Patterns of use and
passage in and around the Kentish Flats wind farm, revealed by the mapped distributions of birds seen,
do show some changes between years but in most cases it is not possible to attribute these changes to
the construction of the wind farm. Even though no changes in bird abundance were statistically
significant, the estimates suggest that the numbers of red-throated divers and lesser black-backed gulls
had gone down (although numbers of divers observed remain low compared with other parts of the
Thames Estuary) and the numbers of herring gulls had gone up. Fewer common tern flights through
the wind farm site to some extent (although no statistical difference in populations is apparent).</dc:description>
  <dc:date xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">20060720</dc:date>
</oai_dc:dc>
