© OpenStreetMap contributors
This study was put in place to assess whether the oil spill was to impact the nationally important waterfowl populations found in the area of Milford Haven. Two polluted (Angle Bay and Pembroke River) and two relatively unpolluted 'control' sites (the Carew/Cresswell and Cleddau Rivers) were monitored intensively over the three winters after the oil spill. The four sites have been monitored following standard Wetland Bird Survey (WeBS) methodology to assess the numbers of waterfowl present, and following standard British Trust for Ornithology all-day (across the tidal cycle) count methodology to assess the feeding areas most used. The data was captured to assess the impact of the Sea Empress oil spill on waterfowl populations in the Milford Haven area. Counts during winter took place between November and March as the estuary is most important for birds during the winter period. The migration and early autumn periods have been excluded because numbers of birds can fluctuate widely from year to year, for reasons not associated with the estuary. Each site was counted twice a month with one count on a spring tide and one on a neap tide where possible. In the first year, only one count was carried out at each site in November. Historical data was used from 1982-1999.
Natural Resources Wales (NRW)
There are no access restrictions to this data. NRW may release, publish or disseminate it freely.
| Other details | ||
| Internal code | Internally assigned metadata identifier | 1904 |
| Title | The title is used to provide a brief and precise description of the dataset such as 'Date', 'Originating organisation/programme', 'Location' and 'Type of survey'. All acronyms and abbreviations should be reproduced in full. | The Abundance and Distribution of Waterfowl Within Milford Haven After the Sea Empress Oil Spill |
| Alternative title | The purpose of alternative title is to record any additional names by which the dataset may be known. | Toreithrwydd a dosbarthiad adar dr yn Aberdaugleddau ar ol gollyngiad olew'r Sea Empress |
| File Identifier | The File Identifier is a code, preferably a GUID, that is globally unique and remains with the same metadata record even if the record is edited or transferred between portals or tools. | 4f4c4942-4343-5764-6473-313130313230 |
| Resource Identifier | This is the code assigned by the data owner. | 110120 |
| Resource type | The resource type will likely be a dataset but could also be a series (collection of datasets with a common specification) or a service. | dataset |
| Start date | This describes the date the resource starts. This may only be the year if month and day are not known | 1984-10-31 |
| End date | This describes the date the resource ends. This may only be the year if month and day are not known | 1999-11-30 |
| Spatial resolution | This describes the spatial resolution of the dataset or the spatial limitations of the service. | inapplicable |
| Frequency of updates | This describes the frequency with which the resource is modified or updated i.e. a monitoring programme that samples once per year has a frequency that is described as 'annually'. | notPlanned |
| Abstract | The abstract provides a clear and brief statement of the content of the resource. | This study was put in place to assess whether the oil spill was to impact the nationally important waterfowl populations found in the area of Milford Haven. Two polluted (Angle Bay and Pembroke River) and two relatively unpolluted 'control' sites (the Carew/Cresswell and Cleddau Rivers) were monitored intensively over the three winters after the oil spill. The four sites have been monitored following standard Wetland Bird Survey (WeBS) methodology to assess the numbers of waterfowl present, and following standard British Trust for Ornithology all-day (across the tidal cycle) count methodology to assess the feeding areas most used. The data was captured to assess the impact of the Sea Empress oil spill on waterfowl populations in the Milford Haven area. Counts during winter took place between November and March as the estuary is most important for birds during the winter period. The migration and early autumn periods have been excluded because numbers of birds can fluctuate widely from year to year, for reasons not associated with the estuary. Each site was counted twice a month with one count on a spring tide and one on a neap tide where possible. In the first year, only one count was carried out at each site in November. Historical data was used from 1982-1999. |
| Lineage | Lineage includes the background information, history of the sources of data, data quality statements and methods. | This study monitored the use made by waterbirds of intertidal areas in the Cleddau Estuary over three winter seasons, in relation to oiling levels. Four sites were studied: - a heavily oiled site, Angle Bay; - a moderately oiled site, Pembroke River, and - two effectively non-oiled sites, the Carew/Cresswell rivers and the 'Upper Cleddau', where the Eastern and Western Cleddau meet. The species recorded include divers, grebes, cormorants, herons, wildfowl, waders and auks. In order to monitor all species comprehensively, an area of open water was also counted at each site. In order to gain a full picture of the use of the four intertidal areas by waterfowl and other birds, counts were carried out across the tidal cycle. This choice of methodolog y allows the most important feeding areas to be identified. Each site was counted once every hour from six hours before to five hours after low tide. Increased monitoring efforts and impact assessment following the Sea Empress oil spill. |
| Related keywords | ||
| Keyword | General subject area(s) associated with the resource, uses multiple controlled vocabularies | Species distribution |
| General subject area(s) associated with the resource, uses multiple controlled vocabularies | Bird taxonomy-related abundance per unit area of surface | |
| General subject area(s) associated with the resource, uses multiple controlled vocabularies | Marine Environmental Data and Information Network | |
| Geographical coverage | ||
| North | The northern-most limit of the data resource in decimal degrees | 51.90308775 |
| East | The eastern-most limit of the data resource in decimal degrees | -4.39927902 |
| South | The southern-most limit of the data resource in decimal degrees | 51.50063889 |
| West | The western-most limit of the data resource in decimal degrees | -5.3019848 |
| Regional sea | Wales (WLS) | |
| Responsible organisations | ||
| Role | The point of contact is person or organisation with responsibility for the creation and maintenance of the metadata for the resource. | pointOfContact |
| Organisation name | Natural Resources Wales (NRW) | |
| Phone | 0300 065 3000 | |
| Delivery point | Maes-y-Ffynnon | |
| Postal code | LL57 2DW | |
| Role | The distributor is the person or organisation that distributes the resource. | distributor |
| Organisation name | Natural Resources Wales (NRW) | |
| Phone | 0300 065 3000 | |
| Delivery point | Maes-y-Ffynnon | |
| Postal code | LL57 2DW | |
| Role | The custodian is the person or organisation that accepts responsibility for the resource and ensures appropriate care and maintenance. If a dataset has been lodged with a Data Archive Centre for maintenance then this organisation is be entered here. | custodian |
| Organisation name | Natural Resources Wales (NRW) | |
| Phone | 0300 065 3000 | |
| Delivery point | Maes-y-Ffynnon | |
| Postal code | LL57 2DW | |
| Role | The originator is the person or organisation who created, collected or produced the resource. | originator |
| Organisation name | Countryside Council for Wales (CCW) | |
| Phone | 0300 065 3000 | |
| Delivery point | Countryside Council for Wales, Maes y Ffynnon | |
| Postal code | LL57 2DW | |
| Dataset constraints | ||
| 20 Limitations on Public Access - Access constraints | ISO restriction code chosen from ISO 19115-1 Codelist | otherRestrictions |
| 20 Limitations on Public Access – Other constraints | Any restriction on the use of the resource such as the need to agree to certain licence conditions. | There are no access restrictions to this data. NRW may release, publish or disseminate it freely. |
| 21 Conditions for Access and Use - Use limitation | Any restrictions imposed on accessing the resource such as the need to agree to certain licence conditions. | © CNC/NRW 1997. There are no use restrictions on this data. Recipients may re-use, reproduce, disseminate this data free of charge in any format or medium, provided they do so accurately, acknowledging both the source and NRW's copyright, and do not use it in a misleading context. It is the recipient's responsibility to ensure the data is fit for the intended purpose, that dissemination or publishing does not result in duplication, and that it is fairly interpreted. Advice on interpretation should be sought where required. To avoid re-using old data, users should periodically obtain the latest version from the original source. |
| Available data formats | ||
| Data format | Format in which digital data can be provided for transfer | Documents |
| Version info | ||
| Date of publication | The publication date of the resource or if previously unpublished the date that the resource was made publicly available via the MEDIN network. | 2000-10-31 |
| Date of last revision | The most recent date that the resource was revised. | 2000-10-31 |
| Metadata date | The date when the content of this metadata record was last updated. | 2018-07-03 |
| Metadata standard name | The name of the metadata standard used to create this metadata | MEDIN Discovery Metadata Standard |
| Metadata standard version | The version of the MEDIN Discovery Metadata Standard used to create the metadata record | Version 2.3.8 |
© OpenStreetMap contributors