84151a00-543a-4f21-81c8-b03eebb07415 English series series 2026-03-12T16:28:33 MEDIN 3.1.2 oceans Bathymetry and Elevation SeaDataNet Parameter Discovery Vocabulary 2023-12-12 revision Post-Construction monitoring The Crown Estate Renewable Energy Development Phases 2012-05-15 revision Renewable Energy Lease area The Crown Estate Renewable Energy Development Areas 2012-05-15 revision Cable Landfall The Crown Estate Renewable Energy Development Areas 2012-05-15 revision Offshore Cable Corridor The Crown Estate Renewable Energy Development Areas 2012-05-15 revision Elevation GEMET - INSPIRE themes, version 1.0 2009-07-31 revision 1 SeaVoX Vertical Co-ordinate Coverages 2020-05-21 revision water column 2014-04-30T00:00:00 2014-05-04T00:00:00 0.828491 1.231625 52.948708 53.182847 TCE-1977 Marine Data Exchange 2014, Fugro EMU, Sheringham Shoal, Bathymetric Survey Bathymetric Survey 2025-06-02T09:01:38 publication English Fugro EMU Limited (Fugro EMU) was commissioned by Scira Offshore Energy Limited to conduct a bathymetry survey of the Sheringham Shoal Offshore Wind Farm and export cables. The survey was required to fulfil Marine Management Organisation (MMO) requirements for post-construction monitoring. In order to meet these requirements, the scope of work required that Fugro EMU provide the following deliverables and reports:  Accurate bathymetry coverage of the inter-array and export cables  Reporting on any changes in conditions since the 2013 Marine Survey The survey was undertaken between 30th April and 4th May 2014 on board Fugro Seeker, all survey objectives and contractual requirements were achieved. There will be no limitations when published on the Marine Data Exchange Once published, there will be no limitations on public access. Data must be used in accordance with the Marine Data Exchanges Terms of Use which can be found on the website. otherRestrictions Data Must be used in accordance to the Marine Data Exchange's Terms of Use: https://www.marinedataexchange.co.uk/content/info/terms-of-use Once published, there will be no constraints on access and use. Data must be used in accordance with the Marine Data Exchanges Terms of Use which can be found on the website. otherRestrictions The Crown Estate +44 020 7851 5000 enquiries@thecrownestate.co.uk custodian Fugro EMU Limited +44 (0) 1489 860050 unknown originator The Crown Estate +44 020 7851 5000 enquiries@thecrownestate.co.uk distributor Statkraft UK Ltd uk-post@statkraft.com owner notPlanned Documents https://www.marinedataexchange.co.uk/details/TCE-1977/summary A link to the web service or dataset. https://www.marinedataexchange.co.uk A link to the general host site. Commission Regulation (EU) No 1089/2010 of 23 November 2010 implementing Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards interoperability of spatial data sets and services publication Conformity with the Commission Regulation (EU) No 1089/2010 was either not relevant to this dataset or not a requirement of the Marine Data Exchange for the creation and submission of this dataset ; therefore, conformity has not been assessed and cannot be declared False series Patch test results, SVP data and all bathymetry offsets were applied during online acquisition. The validity of these values was verified by comparing overlapping data from adjacent lines. Thorough quality control (QC) of the survey data was conducted on board the Fugro Seeker. Following each data delivery to the Fugro EMU head office data was processed, and subjected to a final QC by a senior hydrographic processor. Corrected GNSS navigation data were applied in QINSy during processing and derived from a PPK solution as described in Section 3.1 (above). SVP and positioning errors were checked and corrected in QPS QINSy Processing Manager. Point cleaning was undertaken manually and using filters within IVS Fledermaus software. Final QC was conducted by reviewing standard deviation values for the final gridded surface prior to charting. All data were gridded at the required resolution and exported for plotting in ESRI ArcGIS software. Interpretation was carried out using a combination of IVS Fledermaus software (to view the sounding data point cloud) and ArcGIS (to digitise seabed features). For consistency, the same classifications were used in the MBES seabed characterisation as were used in the 2013 monitoring survey MBES characterisation. Fewer overall classifications were used in this survey than were used in the previous 2013 survey. This was because items like ropes, chains and fishing gear (included in the 2013 SSS interpretation) were unlikely to be visible in the MBES data, and no SSS data was acquired in 2014. ABP Marine Environmental Research Ltd 02380711840 enquiries@abpmer.co.uk pointOfContact EPSG Geodetic Parameter Registry 2022-12-12 revision WGS 84 / UTM zone 31N