bbed17af-696f-4a10-82f1-29a8ba039e57 English series series 2026-03-16T15:24:39 MEDIN 3.1.2 economy geoscientificInformation oceans society Fishing effort SeaDataNet Parameter Discovery Vocabulary 2023-12-12 revision Sedimentary structure SeaDataNet Parameter Discovery Vocabulary 2023-12-12 revision Marine archaeology SeaDataNet Parameter Discovery Vocabulary 2023-12-12 revision Hazards to navigation SeaDataNet Parameter Discovery Vocabulary 2023-12-12 revision Geotechnics SeaDataNet Parameter Discovery Vocabulary 2023-12-12 revision Bathymetry and Elevation SeaDataNet Parameter Discovery Vocabulary 2023-12-12 revision Pre-Construction monitoring The Crown Estate Renewable Energy Development Phases 2012-05-15 revision Renewable Energy Lease area The Crown Estate Renewable Energy Development Areas 2012-05-15 revision Cable Landfall The Crown Estate Renewable Energy Development Areas 2012-05-15 revision Offshore Cable Corridor The Crown Estate Renewable Energy Development Areas 2012-05-15 revision Geology GEMET - INSPIRE themes, version 1.0 2009-07-31 revision 2016-11-30T00:00:00 2016-11-30T23:59:59 -3.2224 -3.1464 53.4705 53.5031 TCE-2229 Marine Data Exchange 2016, Cathie Associates, Walney Extension, Cable Burial Risk Assessment Cable Burial Risk Assessment 2021-05-17T14:11:01 publication English A burial risk assessment has been completed for the export cable route and the infield cables planned for the extension of the Walney Wind Farm. There are to be two Export cables, one from each OSP to transmit the power from the wind farm to shore, 87 No. inter array cables and an interlink cable connecting the twoOSPs. The cable route length forWOW03 is approx. 75km and for WOW04 is approx. 62km. It is anticipated that one offshore joint will be made at KP28-32 on each cable, due to its weight and volume. The aim of this burial risk assessment is to develop a recommended cable burial depth across the array and along the export cables excluding potential sediment mobility allowance. This revision incorporates a more detailed AIS data assessment and a Ground Investigation Report. Where applicable, the Carbon Trust CBRA [Ref. 32] approach is adopted, particularly in relation to the probabilistic assessment of anchoring. There will be no limitations when published on the Marine Data Exchange otherRestrictions Data Must be used in accordance to the Marine Data Exchange's Terms of Use: https://www.marinedataexchange.co.uk/content/info/terms-of-use otherRestrictions The Crown Estate +44 020 7851 5000 enquiries@thecrownestate.co.uk custodian Cathie Associates Ltd. +44(0) 207 868 5123 UK@cathie-associates.com originator The Crown Estate +44 020 7851 5000 enquiries@thecrownestate.co.uk distributor Orsted info@orsted.com owner notPlanned Documents https://www.marinedataexchange.co.uk/details/TCE-2229/summary A link to the web service or dataset. https://www.marinedataexchange.co.uk A link to the general host site. Commission Regulation (EU) No 1089/2010 of 23 November 2010 implementing Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards interoperability of spatial data sets and services 2010-12-08T00:00:00 publication Conformity with the Commission Regulation (EU) No 1089/2010 was either not relevant to this dataset or not a requirement of the Marine Data Exchange for the creation and submission of this dataset; therefore, conformity has not been assessed and cannot be declared False series Where applicable the basis of the methodology used in this assessment was the DNV guideline DNV-RP-F107 Risk Assessment of Pipeline Protection [Ref. 3] which complies with the recommendations of DNV-RP-J301 [Ref. 39] and is consistent with the methodology outlined by the Carbon Trust Cable Burial Risk Assessment Guidance [Ref. 32 & 33]. The method reviews an identified hazard based upon the likely frequency of occurrence and the consequence of the hazard. This method is applicable to primary hazards to cables such as shipping. In regards to secondary hazards such as mobile sediment the risk is that of increasing the frequency or consequences of a primary hazard. When deciding upon a burial depth other considerations which should be taken into account including heating effects and installation risk. ABP Marine Environmental Research Ltd 02380711840 enquiries@abpmer.co.uk pointOfContact EPSG Geodetic Parameter Registry 2022-12-12 revision WGS 84 / UTM zone 30N