c059e8d0-aa82-48b2-a9dc-4edca3993d96 English series series 2026-05-05T12:23:40 MEDIN 3.1.2 geoscientificInformation oceans society Seismic reflection SeaDataNet Parameter Discovery Vocabulary 2026-04-23 revision Marine archaeology SeaDataNet Parameter Discovery Vocabulary 2026-04-23 revision Side-scan sonar SeaDataNet Parameter Discovery Vocabulary 2026-04-23 revision Geotechnics SeaDataNet Parameter Discovery Vocabulary 2026-04-23 revision Bathymetry and Elevation SeaDataNet Parameter Discovery Vocabulary 2026-04-23 revision Consenting The Crown Estate Renewable Energy Development Phases 2012-05-15 revision Agreement for Lease Area The Crown Estate Renewable Energy Development Areas 2012-05-15 revision Offshore Cable Corridor The Crown Estate Renewable Energy Development Areas 2012-05-15 revision Geology GEMET - INSPIRE themes, version 1.0 2009-07-31 revision SeaDataNet sea areas 2012-11-07 revision North Sea SeaVoX Vertical Co-ordinate Coverages 2020-05-21 revision soil and sediment boundary layer 2014-09-04T23:00:00 2014-09-16T23:00:00 -1.5710164 -1.1812238 57.4107193 57.5657633 CES-76 Marine Data Exchange 2014, ORCA Marine, SULA Diving, Hywind Offshore Wind Farm, Marine Archaeological Assessment 2025-09-01T14:28:43 publication English ORCA Marine was commissioned by Xodus Group and Hywind (Scotland) Limited (HSL) to assess the potential impacts of the proposed marine wind turbine development of Hywind Scotland Pilot Park, approximately 25km east of Peterhead, Aberdeenshire, near Buchan Deep. This baseline assessment will identify any sites of archaeological or historical significance that might be affected by the proposed development and where / if appropriate make some initial suggestion for managing or mitigating any identified issues and impacts concerning the marine archaeological and heritage resource. The report incorporates a Desk Based Assessment (DBA) of the possible submerged cultural heritage within the Proposed Offshore Turbine Deployment Area and export cable route corridor prepared by Scientific Underwater Logistics and Diving (SULA Diving) on behalf of ORCA Marine. SULA Diving were also commissioned to assist in the evaluation of the remote sensing survey data (multi-beam echo sounder (MBES), side scan sonar (SSS), Magnetometer and sub-bottom Profiler (SBP)) obtained by survey company MMT on behalf of HSL. Also provided within this series is a document detailing key mitigation issues along the export cable route and offshore turbine deployment area, for discussion and agreement. There will be no limitations when published on the Marine Data Exchange otherRestrictions Data Must be used in accordance to the Marine Data Exchange's Terms of Use: https://www.marinedataexchange.co.uk/content/info/terms-of-use otherRestrictions Crown Estate Scotland +44 (0)131 260 6070 enquiries@crownestatescotland.com custodian Xodus Group Ltd info@xodusgroup.com originator Crown Estate Scotland +44 (0)131 260 6070 enquiries@crownestatescotland.com distributor Equinor https://www.equinor.com/about-us/contact-us owner notPlanned Documents https://www.marinedataexchange.co.uk/details/CES-76/summary A link to the web service or dataset. https://www.marinedataexchange.co.uk A link to the general host site. Commission Regulation (EU) No 1089/2010 of 23 November 2010 implementing Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards interoperability of spatial data sets and services 2010-12-08T00:00:00 publication Conformity with the Commission Regulation (EU) No 1089/2010 was either not relevant to this dataset or not a requirement of the Marine Data Exchange for the creation and submission of this dataset; therefore, conformity has not been assessed and cannot be declared False series Although the general quality of the MBES data was suitable for detecting anomalies, with little banding, rippling or other survey artefacts caused by swell and tidal effects, the resolution of the MBES data is, on its own, not suitable to provide a positive identification of a feature. While the majority of the survey track images were of sufficient quality to identify features, fifteen of the longer tracks became pixelated when zoomed in. These survey tracks were not considered of high enough resolution to identify potential cultural features. These tracks are summarised in Appendix 1. ABP Marine Environmental Research 023 8071 1840 enquiries@abpmer.co.uk pointOfContact EPSG Geodetic Parameter Registry 2022-12-12 revision WGS 84 / UTM zone 30N